Faculty Learning Communities explore educational concepts and technology

Faculty Learning Communities explore educational concepts and technology

Effective teaching and learning methods are at the heart of what makes Penn State a leader in higher education. Those methods constantly evolve in an effort to match the rapid emergence of new technology that has the potential to transform education. Ideally, those evolutions will increasingly make a Penn State education more accessible and beneficial.

Teaching and Learning with Technology (TLT) annually provides a resource that allows University faculty to be at the forefront of investigating how new technologies can support innovative pedagogy. Faculty Learning Communities (FLCs) are open to tenure-track and teaching faculty at any Penn State campus, and each small cohort works together for a year toward a shared goal. Also, these groups can be formed cross-college, cross-campus, and/or cross-discipline.

Each FLC is created and led by a full-time Penn State faculty member with support coming from TLT. Leaders of these communities receive a $500 stipend and up to an additional $500 in funding to conduct lunches, tech tools sessions, guest speaker appearances, and other meetings with their FLC.

The group of FLC leaders for the 2018-19 academic year met a number of criteria in order to secure their roles. Along with enthusiasm for their topics, they were able to bring along at least three peers to participate in their FLC, collaborate with a TLT staff member on a kickoff meeting, schedule and facilitate regular meetings, and share their FLC’s outcomes at the TLT Symposium.

This year’s FLCs reach across Pennsylvania from Erie to Berks County and cover a broad range of topics from teaching data visualization to global learning in agriculture.

Here is the full list of 2018-19 Faculty Learning Communities at Penn State and their respective leaders:

FLC Leader                          Campus               Topic

Benjamin Lear                    University Park    Teaching of Data Visualizations

Dawn Pfeifer Reitz             Berks                   Innovative Instructional Technologies in the Classroom

Heather Cole                      Erie                       Digital Fluency and Content Development

Lara LaDage                       Altoona               Mentoring Undergraduate Student Researchers

Melanie Miller Foster &

Noel Habashy                     University Park    Global Learning in Agriculture

Neyda Abreu                      DuBois                 Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Chemistry

Beth Egan                           University Park    Open Education Resources: Local & Global Appeal

The Bluebox is Penn State’s next step as a leader in learning space innovation

The Bluebox is Penn State’s next step as a leader in learning space innovation

The Bluebox doesn’t look like a traditional classroom, and it doesn’t function like one either.

As a high-tech experimental learning space, it’s not meant to, as it is anything but traditional, and in coming semesters more rooms like it are slated to launch across Penn State’s campuses. Designing and implementing the spaces comes as part of the University’s ongoing efforts that have helped make it a worldwide leader in educational technology.

The Bluebox, launched in 2016, is designed to increase student engagement and support active, collaborative learning pedagogies. Its design, along with its versatile nature, is the latest manifestation of decades of Penn State’s educational research around active learning. This research has shown time and again that a more dynamic and flexible learning space yields positive results when compared with the increasingly outmoded classrooms and lecture halls that many still define as the essential standard for university classes.

“Traditional classrooms are set up for students to sit in rows and listen to a professor at the front of the room, and this setup is not conducive to teaching with the idea that learning is an active and interactive process,” said Sarah Ades, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biology who has taught a class in the Bluebox.

Everything you see in the Bluebox is there (or not there) for a reason backed by science, student and faculty experience, or both—which is what really makes it stand out in the experimental education field.

“There are reasons for everything we do, and a science that has gone into how this room looks and functions,” said Jennifer Sparrow, Penn State’s senior director of teaching and learning with technology. “The space itself is a laboratory in some ways. It’s a classroom designed to help us develop new understandings about classrooms and how to improve them with the technologies we have today.”

The studio combines easily movable and adaptable furniture and whiteboards with higher-tech educational tools, like several displays that allow for wireless projection, and can be quickly reconfigured to accommodate a professor’s or class’s needs. To keep pace with evolving research and technology, it is designed to undergo more structural changes every semester as necessary.

Instructors can use or not use whichever classroom components are appropriate for their learning outcomes. Some prefer to use all of the screens and modular tables available, while others have found that clearing out everything except the mobile chairs and whiteboards works best for a particular teaching session.

“More traditional classrooms, they limit flexibility,” said Sparrow. “The intent here was to bring an experimental classroom into play that really allowed faculty to think differently about how they taught, and to provide them with a unique support structure that would help them with whatever they might need.”

The robust support structure serves as one of the classroom’s most unique multi-faceted components. Instructional designers, technologists, and a research team dedicated to continuously evolving the space and helping instructors use it in the best ways for the classes they’re teaching and the results they’re hoping to achieve are available to help faculty using the space.

“We are really unique in this full concierge level of support,” said Sparrow. “Spaces don’t transform learning, great teaching transforms learning. Penn State provides the scaffolding needed for faculty and students to be successful.”

The instructors who teach in the Bluebox meet monthly as well to discuss how they’re using the space, what is working well, and how the space and learning experience can improve.

The Bluebox is the first room of its kind at Penn State, but it certainly won’t be the last. The space has served so far as a sort of litmus test for how the University will proceed in its future classroom designs and updates.

“These adaptive spaces are important for education,” said Ades. “There are many ways to design adaptive learning spaces. Research is important to evaluate what works best, to maximize their value. The same as a lecture hall with fixed seats that can only face front are difficult to adapt to an educational style other than lecturing, new spaces with designs that don’t work aren’t good either.”

The University is taking findings from the Bluebox, combining them with its ongoing scientific research, and using the information to help plan for how spaces will be redesigned across the Penn State community.

“We’re always asking ourselves, ‘How do we lead in learning spaces instead of just being a keeper of facilities?’” said Sparrow. “And we have a mechanism in place for how we’re going to do this.”

If the Bluebox is any indication, it’s likely the demand for experimental learning spaces will be high. By its second semester of availability, the Bluebox was completely filled, and the university had to turn away interested instructors heading into the Fall 2017 semester.

“We plan to grow these experiences, and demand will push development,” said Sparrow.